| Growing downward from branches, high up in these old Banyan trees, are a kind of branch that eventually grows into the ground, sending down roots, and in effect forming a unique new tree trunk. |
Mr. T travels to the Maldives Islands to provide professional development to the teachers at Meynaa School on Holhudhoo Island. Everything in this blog is true, except for what's not.
| Growing downward from branches, high up in these old Banyan trees, are a kind of branch that eventually grows into the ground, sending down roots, and in effect forming a unique new tree trunk. |
| Recently, I gave up wearing my hat..... in exchange for the shade provided by.... |
| My new bright red umbrella! |
![]() |
| Now this change did not come about because of the rain.... since the rains had not yet started when I actually bought the umbrella..... rather... I got the umbrella for... |
![]() |
| The sun! An umbrella I've learned, provides a lot more shade than a hat. Added bonus, the umbrella does not mess up my hair by disturbing the gel I now use. But then.... I'm not a vain person, so who cares! |
![]() |
| This workshop on assessment was one of the first sessions I held with the teachers. It was intense, fast paced, with lots of activities. |
| Assessment: it is a process, done over time, to collect information to improve student learning. First I created a three part Graphic Organizer on the board to explain the three types of assessment: diagnostic, formative and summative. |
![]() |
| Diagnostic Assessment When: before instruction What: to find out what the child already knows. Why: to plan next steps Examples: pre-test, IQ test |
![]() |
| Formative Assessment When: during instruction What: part of the classroom routine Why: to help with lesson planning Examples: quiz, homework, review games, lab work |
![]() |
| Summative Assessment When: at the end of instruction What: information on student learning over time Why: to provide feedback to student, parents, teacher and administration. Examples: term exams, Cambridge exams |
| Following my direct instruction on the three types of assessment, I introduced Graphic Organizers to the teachers. First I used a "Bubble Map" to demonstrate how to use the Graphic Organizer to describe Diagnostic Assessment. Next, I divided the class into two, and asked half of the class to now create their own "Bubble Map" Graphic Organizer to describe formative assessment, and the other half of the room to do the same, but for summative assessment. When the timer buzzed, I randomly called on a teachers to come to the board and complete one "Bubble Map" for formative assessment and explain it to the whole group, and one to do the same for summative assessment. |
| To bring a little levity to this rather heavy topic, I placed on each of the four walls, one of the above symbols: clouds, balance, kite and dart. I instructed the teachers, when I gave the okay to get up, to move to the symbol that in some way attracted them, or that they related to. Once teachers grouped around a symbol I asked them to talk about what it was that brought them there. Only after this, did I tell them this is a diagnostic communication styles assessment. Cloud: relationship oriented Dart: only the facts, straight to the point Kite: moving all over the place brainstorming ideas Balance: collecting ideas to make a decision |
| To assess if the teachers really understood the three types of assessment, I passed out pieces of paper with a type of assessment (or combinations of assessments) written on them. In small groups, teachers were asked to draw a picture of the assessment written on the paper they received..... BUT... they could only use pictures! They could not use any written words in their picture.... |
| That's me in this summative assessment drawing! |
| Can you guess which of the three types of assessment this one is showing? |
| Diagnostic assessment..... and so proud of it! |
![]() |
| Okay... I have no hair on the top of my head, and when I get into the humid tropics, the hair on the side of my head frizzes out ..... making me look like a clown! Not a really good professional look when I am suppose to be facilitating educationally focused professional development workshops. |
Now, should Mr. T take this guy's advice and buy that gel? |
| Or should Mr. T take this guy's advice and buy this gel? |
| Okay.... I bought the gel and I still have no hair on the top of my head. But check out how nicely the hair on the side of my head lays so flat, what with all that gel plastered on! By-the-way..... You did notice it's the same guy offering the advise in both pictures with the same container of gel.... didn't you? How do we see ourselves? How do we see others? Perception! Perception! Perception! So.... Where there is perception, there is deception. |
![]() |
| Good listening skills involve more than just your ears! |
| Mr. T explains to the teachers how their students' listening skills can be developed over time.... using some fun and rather unusual approaches. |
![]() |
| Students are to listen only.... they are to do all of the calculation in their brain only.... no paper and pencil! A young elephant weighs 1500 kilo. It eats half its weight in grass every day. How much will it eat in one day? Five days? If grass costs 10 rufiyaa per kilo, how much will the elphant owner spend on grass in five days? |
![]() |
| It's all in your head.... no paper... no pencil! The teacher reads this problem to students and they then answer it. 2+2 - 1 X 2 - 2 divided by 2 + 1 = ( ) The variables here are the speed at which the problem is read and the length of the equation to be solved! Start easy, with simple, short problems. Then as the teacher diagnosis their student's abilities, more and more numbers can be added, bigger numbers, more complex calculations.... you might even include the square root at some point! |
| This is a fun one to do if students have been sitting in their seats for awhile. It gets them up and moving about, as well as challenging their listening skills. The first student says..... "My favorite animal is an elephant." Note: the item could be a city, food, book, a famous person, etc. Each subsequent student must repeat each aninmal the other students have said before them......
|
![]() |
| At one time, a teacher could teach a subject to a whole class. Now, rather than teaching a subject to a whole class, teachers teach individual students. Differentiation is about how a teacher modifies their lesson plans, so as to regularly and continually meet the individual learning needs of each and every student in their classroom. |
| The learning objective for the secondary teachers was to understand and practice how to differentiate by lesson objective. In other words to write different lesson objectives, to meet the different needs of different students - lesson objectives written by: Thinking skill - the verb used in the objective Content - what the students will learn Resource - where the students will get the information Product - what the students will create |
![]() |
| The workshop objective for the primary school teachers was to learn how to differentiate instruction by: readiness interest learning style |
| First the teachers wrote their own definition for differentiation and shared this with their table group. Mr. T then facilitated a whole class discussion on the term. The primary school teachers were given grade level lesson plans to review, using a handout Mr. T had created. At each grade level, the lesson plan was differentiated by readiness, interest, and learning style. When the teachers completed the handout, they discussed which form of differentiation might work best in their classrooms. |
| Mr. T modeled for the secondary teachers, a way of writing their lesson objectives by changing the verb. In this example, the Unit Mr. T was teaching was "early humans." The topic within this Unit Mr. T decided to teach was "tools used to survive." Mr. T showed three objectives, based on ability levels: Students will be able to list three tools early humans used to survive. Students will be able to compare and contrast the three tools early humans used to survive. Students will be able to create a new tool early humans could have used to help them survive. By changing the verb, the objective becomes more and more complex, therein differentiating based on ability grouping. |
![]() |
| The basis for Mr. T's lesson was Blooms Taxonomy which he shared with the teachers. At each level, the verbs change, so the objective becomes more complex, requiring higher order of reasoning. For example, verbs that could be used in a lesson objective at each of Blooms' six levels could include: Remembering: list, define, recall Understanding: classify, describe, paraphrase Applying: choose, illustrate, solve Analyzing: contrast, examine, distinguish Evaluating: appraise, judge, value Creating: assemble, design, formulate |
| Following his having modeled how to differentiate by objective, Mr. T randomly gave teachers (small groups of two to three) a Unit word written on a piece of paper. Unit words included, for example, Global Warming, Maldives, Economics, etc. Teachers were then asked to select a topic within that Unit, and write a lesson plan objective for each of the six levels within Blooms Taxonomy. At the end of the mini demo lesson, Mr. T used the "thumbs up and thumbs down" with the class to check for understanding - to make sure the directions were clear to everyone. |
| Teachers were given a specific amount of time to develop their six lesson plan objectives, using the Blooms verbs. With the local Maldivian secondary teachers (a class of 14 teachers so only 5 groups), Mr. T had each group present to all the teachers, their lesson plan.... talking about each of the six objectives and explaining how at each subsequent level, the objective becaming more complex. Here Mr. Hamad, the Deputy Principal at the school, explains his group's unit topic of democracy. |
| Teachers were divided into groups to work together on the assignment of designing lesson objectives, using the six levels of Blooms Taxonomy. |
| The secondary expatriot teacher workshop group was large, with 23 participating. Rather than having each group share to the whole class, Mr. T had the small groups present to each other. Each group was given a specific amount of time, using a timer, to present. Then, when the buzzer went off, Mr. T asked the small groups to go in search of a different group to make their presentation to. This procedure allowed the small groups to present their six part lesson objectives three times, and for them to hear the six part lesson plans of three other groups. An added bonus..... teachers had been sitting at their tables a long time working on a difficult topic.... differentiation.... so this sharing out by small groups, got them standing up and moving about! |
![]() |
| A brief reflection on the session, brought this part of the workshop to a productive end. |